Month: October 2006

Maybe it was originally meant to fix problems with National Guard deployment that were made apparent in New Orleans. Maybe it’s just some panicky anarchists misreading the legalese. Whatever the cause, The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007 (H.R. 5122) that passed without much fanfare a few weeks back is getting a lot of heat now. Why? It appears to make martial law that much easier.

The whole martial law story seems to have started with (or near) the folks at IndyMedia. Now, IndyMedia is not the world’s most reliable news source, and it’s far from unbiased, but it doesn’t just blindly make stuff up either.

From there, it’s caught the attention of a few general-audience sites, but nothing genuinely mainstream. Places like BoingBoing, Slashdot, and the Minneapolis/St. Paul City Pages all hit it, as do political paranoiacs on the right like the John Birch Society and the Rational Review.

But none of the “real” news outlets have touched it. No ink on paper, no mainstream news. Not MSNBC, the NYT, WSJ, IHT…

Probably that’s because it’s a crazy-ass conspiracy theory. Maybe it’s because nobody would believe it, even if it were true.

I guess we’ll find out.

Less than a week after I said that mocking religion was a bad idea, I mocked religion in an email and offended a friend of mine. Let’s go back to mocking journalism and blogs:

• NY Metro piece on the “Ultra Extreme Calorie Restriction Diet” of… nearly 2000 calories a day? That’s not very restricted at all. Quit whining.
• On the MA governor’s race, RedState asks What if Kerry Healy Loses? She’s nearly twenty points back in the polls, she’s running a divisive and bitter campaign, her major proposal is to cut tolls on the pike, and her legacy is collapsing tunnels and an endorsement by someone who spends all his time going around saying how much Massachusetts sucks. She’s going to lose, the only question is the margin.

I don’t often watch movies, so when I set up to watch two versions of the same plot, you know something serious is on. First, Dawn of the Dead (2004) next in the Netflix queue is the original Dawn of the Dead (1978). I just finished reading The Road, and I’m halfway through World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie Wars.

A whole swarm of fantasies about the end of the world, self-sufficiency, loneliness, and human weakness.

Part of my job is sorting the wheat from the chaff of the internet. That means I come across some pretty brilliant chaff, like this Conservababes Forum discussion of next month’s elections:

IF THE SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS WIN IN 2006 AND 2008:

YOUR INCOME AND PAYROLL TAXES WILL GO UP

THE US WILL LOSE THE WAR AGAINST ISLAMOFASCISTS AROUND THE GLOBE

3 OR 4 NEW SUPREME COURT JUDGES AND DOZENS OF FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGES WILL BE LEFTISTS

ABORTIONS WILL INCREASE

HEALTHCARE WILL BE NATIONALIZED BRINGING ON FORCED EUTHANIZATION OF THE AGING

HUMAN CLONING AND EMBRYONIC STEM CELL FARMING WILL BE LEGALIZED

PUBLIC EDUCATION QUALITY WILL CONTINUE TO DECLINE
…
FREE TRADE WILL BE RESTRICTED BY TARIFFS AND REGULATIONS FAVORING UNIONS

AT LEAST ONE MAJOR US CITY WILL BE VAPORIZED BY TERRORISTS

AT LEAST 10 LARGE SCHOOLS WILL BE DESTROYED BY ISLAMOFASCIST TERRORISM
…
GUN MANUFACTURERS WILL BE SUED, POSSIBLY INTO BANKRUPTCY

GAY MARRIAGE AND POLYGAMY WILL BE LEGALIZED AND NORMALIZED

FAST-FOOD CHAINS WILL BE SUED, POSSIBLY INTO BANKRUPTCY

THESE ARE THE ELEMENTS OF THE SOCIALIST AGENDA… AND THEY WILL BE SUCCESSFUL. FORGIVE ME IF I LEFT ANY OUT.

I just can’t tell if they’re serious. I mean, you can argue about Bush’s record on the economy and on security, but forced euthanasia and polygamy? And there’s some stuff in there that really seems out of place– regulations on the Panama canal? And why would blowing up cities be part of the Democratic agenda? Not to mention the panicky fear of “socialism,” which I thought the US grew out of at about the same time I grew out of being afraid of monsters under the bed.